Mitchell Leeds, LLP

Call today for a
Free Consultation


Toll Free: 877-637-1045

Recognized California
Medical Malpractice Lawyer

$68 MillionLargest Jury Verdict in Fresno County history for failure to comply with hospital standards for patient safety, leaving elderly man in permanent coma. Jury also awarded punitive damages.
$5.5 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose acute blood loss after cancer surgery resulting in brain damage to physician
$7 MillionPlus Settlement: Negligent performance of intubation post-operatively, resulting in severe brain damage to minor child.
$10.8 MillionConfidential settlement for an adult who suffered catastrophic injury from a stroke
$22 MillionRobyn Frankel vs. Palo Alto Medical Foundation GroupJury verdict for paralysis caused to patient after an unnecessary procedure.
$4.25 MillionSettlement for failure to quickly respond to a minor plaintiff’s hyperthermia after surgery resulting in catastrophic injuries including brain damage
$4 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose fetal distress resulting in minor plaintiff suffering from severe static encephalopathy
$5.5 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose and treat kernicterus resulting in severe brain damage of child

Settle for More.

Free Consultations. You Don't Pay Unless We Win.

Contact Us Today for YourFree Consultation

Fill out the form below and we'll be in touch within 24 hours!

    Medical Malpractice Campaign Was Heavily Funded Against

    In the last part of 2013, a ballot initiative to increase the amount of funds that could be awarded in medical malpractice lawsuits was denied. This ballot measure would have allowed those who suffered from medical malpractice to get an increased amount of damages (increase the cap), but it also would have required hospitals to test doctors for drug and alcohol use. In addition, it would have required doctors to check a state-run database before prescribing narcotics to any patient.

    The initiative was overwhelmingly rejected in November 2013. Trial lawyers and a consumer advocacy group called Consumer Watchdog were in favor of the ballot, but healthcare providers, doctors, and insurance companies were very much against the measure. They were likely against it because it would ultimately cost them more money.

    The insurance side spent roughly $58.6 million to keep this measure out of California laws whereas the support group spend approximately $11 million. It is clear that there were some powerful forces with deep pockets behind the “no” side of the initiative.

    The California caps will remain where they are for now, and there continue to be no legal requirements for hospitals to check doctors for drug and alcohol use.

    For more information about this measure or any other aspect of medical malpractice, contact an experienced medical malpractice attorney. Call the Mitchell Leeds, LLP at 877-637-1045. We are happy to help you with your legal needs.


    lorum ipsumlorum ipsum Say


    "In over 25 years of practice on the defense side of malpractice cases, Jeff Mitchell is the attorney I fear most. He takes very good cases. Jeff has the medicine and the applicable literature down cold. He is without a doubt the best cross-examiner I have ever seen. I have paid his clients a lot of money over the years."
    - John M.

    Our Locations

    Google Analytics Alternative