Warning: Use of undefined constant ‘fbimage’ - assumed '‘fbimage’' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/customer/www/mitchelllawsf.com/public_html/wp-content/themes/mitchellinjury/header.php on line 32

Warning: Use of undefined constant ” - assumed '”' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/customer/www/mitchelllawsf.com/public_html/wp-content/themes/mitchellinjury/header.php on line 32
Warning: Use of undefined constant ‘fbimage’ - assumed '‘fbimage’' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/customer/www/mitchelllawsf.com/public_html/wp-content/themes/mitchellinjury/header.php on line 35
” / > Hospital experiments for tracking patients' radiation exposure
Mitchell Leeds, LLP

Call today for a
Free Consultation


Toll Free: 877-637-1045

Recognized California
Medical Malpractice Lawyer

$68 MillionLargest Jury Verdict in Fresno County history for failure to comply with hospital standards for patient safety, leaving elderly man in permanent coma. Jury also awarded punitive damages.
$5.5 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose acute blood loss after cancer surgery resulting in brain damage to physician
$7 MillionPlus Settlement: Negligent performance of intubation post-operatively, resulting in severe brain damage to minor child.
$10.8 MillionConfidential settlement for an adult who suffered catastrophic injury from a stroke
$22 MillionRobyn Frankel vs. Palo Alto Medical Foundation GroupJury verdict for paralysis caused to patient after an unnecessary procedure.
$4.25 MillionSettlement for failure to quickly respond to a minor plaintiff’s hyperthermia after surgery resulting in catastrophic injuries including brain damage
$4 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose fetal distress resulting in minor plaintiff suffering from severe static encephalopathy
$5.5 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose and treat kernicterus resulting in severe brain damage of child

Settle for More.

Free Consultations. You Don't Pay Unless We Win.

Contact Us Today for YourFree Consultation

Fill out the form below and we'll be in touch within 24 hours!

    Hospital experiments with tracking patients’ radiation exposure

    Many of us in San Francisco have heard that radiation exposure is bad for you. It can increase a patient’s chances of developing cancer and have other negative side effects. However, we also know that many patients need to undergo treatments, procedures and tests that involve radiation. So how do doctors decide when a patient should and should not be exposed to radiation?

    Right now, doctors at a hospital in Utah are piloting a program that tracks how often patients have been exposed to radiation and provides that information to physicians. The hope is that physicians can use the information to make informed decisions about when to recommend that a patient undergo a test or procedure that will expose him or her to radiation.

    Today, the culture of medicine is to make sure patients undergo every test possible to ensure that they are healthy or to rule out possibilities. By 2006, for example, doctors were performing 60 million CT scans each year. In 1980, they were only performing 3 million. Although running tests like CT scans can rule out possible illnesses, CT scans are very expensive and aren’t always necessary. The doctors piloting the new program are hoping that doctors will think twice before ordering these tests and procedures if a patient has already had substantial exposure to radiation. It could prevent serious injuries to patients later on.

    Fortunately, our state is doing its part to keep patients safe as well. c As we continue to learn more about the harmful effects of radiation exposure, hopefully doctors will think carefully before putting patients in that position.


    Source: American Medical News, “Project tallies lifetime radiation from health scans,” Christine S. Moyer, June 24, 2013

    lorum ipsumlorum ipsum Say

    "In over 25 years of practice on the defense side of malpractice cases, Jeff Mitchell is the attorney I fear most. He takes very good cases. Jeff has the medicine and the applicable literature down cold. He is without a doubt the best cross-examiner I have ever seen. I have paid his clients a lot of money over the years."
    - John M.

    Our Locations

    Google Analytics Alternative