Warning: Use of undefined constant ‘fbimage’ - assumed '‘fbimage’' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/customer/www/mitchelllawsf.com/public_html/wp-content/themes/mitchellinjury/header.php on line 32

Warning: Use of undefined constant ” - assumed '”' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/customer/www/mitchelllawsf.com/public_html/wp-content/themes/mitchellinjury/header.php on line 32
Warning: Use of undefined constant ‘fbimage’ - assumed '‘fbimage’' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/customer/www/mitchelllawsf.com/public_html/wp-content/themes/mitchellinjury/header.php on line 35
” / > California initiative to address medical malpractice issues
Mitchell Leeds, LLP

Call today for a
Free Consultation


Toll Free: 877-637-1045

Recognized California
Medical Malpractice Lawyer

$68 MillionLargest Jury Verdict in Fresno County history for failure to comply with hospital standards for patient safety, leaving elderly man in permanent coma. Jury also awarded punitive damages.
$5.5 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose acute blood loss after cancer surgery resulting in brain damage to physician
$7 MillionPlus Settlement: Negligent performance of intubation post-operatively, resulting in severe brain damage to minor child.
$10.8 MillionConfidential settlement for an adult who suffered catastrophic injury from a stroke
$22 MillionRobyn Frankel vs. Palo Alto Medical Foundation GroupJury verdict for paralysis caused to patient after an unnecessary procedure.
$4.25 MillionSettlement for failure to quickly respond to a minor plaintiff’s hyperthermia after surgery resulting in catastrophic injuries including brain damage
$4 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose fetal distress resulting in minor plaintiff suffering from severe static encephalopathy
$5.5 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose and treat kernicterus resulting in severe brain damage of child

Settle for More.

Free Consultations. You Don't Pay Unless We Win.

Contact Us Today for YourFree Consultation

Fill out the form below and we'll be in touch within 24 hours!

    California initiative to address medical malpractice issues

    A primary goal of a proposed ballot initiative for California’s November election is designed to increase the non-economic damages cap on medical malpractice awards in the state. But the father of two children killed a decade ago by a driver who was under the influence of painkillers is concerned with educating others about the other provisions of the proposal.

    The father hopes that the initiative will bring attention to the issue of the distribution of dangerous prescription drugs. Not only would the law require doctors to check a prescription database to check for evidence of patients ‘doctor-shopping’ to load up on prescriptions, but it would also require doctors themselves to be tested for drugs and alcohol on a random basis.

    The drugged driver of the car that killed the two children had sought painkillers from different doctors before the crash. The family only received $500,000 for their pain and suffering due to the current medical malpractice guidelines, which provided a $250,000 per claim. The new law would increase the cap based upon inflation since the measure was originally passed. In 2014, that adjustment would increase the cap to $1.1 million per claim.

    Even though the driver was convicted and is serving jail time, the doctor who prescribed the painkillers escaped consequences both criminally and by the Medical Board of California. The children’s father hopes that the law would make doctors more accountable and subject to more serious disciplinary measures, which ideally would prevent future tragedies.

    Regardless of the success of the initiative with voters, no amount of money can replace lives that are lost as a result of a negligent physician’s prescription of drugs. However, it is important that those who lose loved ones as a result of medical malpractice are able to seek justice and avoid suffering related financial burdens.

    Source: Sacramento Business Journal, “Bereaved father explains ‘the sweeteners’ in malpractice measure,” Kathy Robertson, May 9, 2014

    lorum ipsumlorum ipsum Say

    "In over 25 years of practice on the defense side of malpractice cases, Jeff Mitchell is the attorney I fear most. He takes very good cases. Jeff has the medicine and the applicable literature down cold. He is without a doubt the best cross-examiner I have ever seen. I have paid his clients a lot of money over the years."
    - John M.

    Our Locations

    Google Analytics Alternative