Mitchell Law Firm

Call today for a
Free Consultation

415-769-3400

Toll Free: 877-637-1045

CALIFORNIA'S TOP
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LAWYER

$5.5 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose and treat kernicterus resulting in severe brain damage of child
$5.5 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose acute blood loss after cancer surgery resulting in brain damage to physician
$7 MillionPlus Settlement: Negligent performance of intubation post-operatively, resulting in severe brain damage to minor child.
$10.8 MillionConfidential settlement for an adult who suffered catastrophic injury from a stroke
$22 MillionRobyn Frankel vs. Palo Alto Medical Foundation GroupJury verdict for paralysis caused to patient after an unnecessary procedure.
$4.25 MillionSettlement for failure to quickly respond to a minor plaintiff’s hyperthermia after surgery resulting in catastrophic injuries including brain damage
$4 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose fetal distress resulting in minor plaintiff suffering from severe static encephalopathy

Settle for More.

Free Consultations. You Don't Pay Unless We Win.

Contact Us Today for YourFree Consultation

Fill out the form below and we'll be in touch within 24 hours!

  • captcha

Proposition 46: California Malpractice Cap Produces Huge Spending

Bob Pack wished to sue the HMO physicians for carelessly prescribing painkillers to a drug-addicted nanny who hit his ten-year-old son and seven-year-old daughter as they were getting ice cream in fall 2003. However, according to California’s 1970’s-era medical malpractice law, a $250,000 cap existed on pain and suffering rather than taking legal action due to the cap, he settled so he could look after his wife, who had a miscarriage in the collision.

The November 2014 ballot proposal named after Troy and Alana—Pack’s children—aimed to increase the cap to $1.1 million. The campaign had endorsed an intense conflict between physicians and lawyers over injured patients’ rights with over $102 million spent in one of California’s most costly ballot proposals.



lorum ipsumlorum ipsum Say

In over 25 years of practice on the defense side of malpractice cases, Jeff Mitchell is the attorney I fear most. He takes very good cases. Jeff has the medicine and the applicable literature down cold. He is without a doubt the best cross-examiner I have ever seen. I have paid his clients a lot of money over the years.
- John M.

Our Locations

Google Analytics Alternative