Mitchell Law Firm

Call today for a
Free Consultation

415-769-3400

Toll Free: 877-637-1045

CALIFORNIA'S TOP
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LAWYER

$5.5 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose and treat kernicterus resulting in severe brain damage of child
$5.5 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose acute blood loss after cancer surgery resulting in brain damage to physician
$7 MillionPlus Settlement: Negligent performance of intubation post-operatively, resulting in severe brain damage to minor child.
$10.8 MillionConfidential settlement for an adult who suffered catastrophic injury from a stroke
$22 MillionRobyn Frankel vs. Palo Alto Medical Foundation GroupJury verdict for paralysis caused to patient after an unnecessary procedure.
$4.25 MillionSettlement for failure to quickly respond to a minor plaintiff’s hyperthermia after surgery resulting in catastrophic injuries including brain damage
$4 MillionSettlement for failure to diagnose fetal distress resulting in minor plaintiff suffering from severe static encephalopathy

Settle for More.

Free Consultations. You Don't Pay Unless We Win.

Contact Us Today for YourFree Consultation

Fill out the form below and we'll be in touch within 24 hours!

  • captcha

The Fundamentals of California Medical Malpractice Law

Medical malpractice generally takes place when a healthcare professional violates the standard of care when treating a patient. This violation must then bring about injury to the patient in order for the patient to have a medical malpractice case. A standard of care is a technical word that alludes to the usually conventional methods and practices that every healthcare practitioner in the field would utilize when caring for a patient enduring a particular illness or disorder. It can differ conditional on numerous factors, as well as the patient’s age and total wellbeing. However, it is insufficient to prove that the physician violated the standard of care. A person must establish that this violation immediately led to the injury as well. This can be a hard step to establish and frequently demands the help of expert witnesses. The extent of what the law also regards as treatment in California malpractice cases is rather extensive. Treatment consists of not only medical care or distributing prescription drugs but during the whole medical process.

Every state also establishes its own statute of limitations for filing medical malpractice claims. A statute of limitation is the period of time in which an injured patient can file a claim against a medical provider. When this time amount elapses, the patient is normally prohibited from filing a claim. As stated by California malpractice law, a patient can file a medical malpractice claim equal to one year following the finding of the act that brought about the injury or equal to three years from the date that injury took place. Whichever happens first is relevant. These exact time restricts indicate it is essential for medical malpractice victims to proceed quickly when contacting medical malpractice attorneys. California lawyers could examine an individual’s case and start the claim process to guarantee that he or she files his or her claim promptly.

The money a patient requests when filing a claim against a medical provider for medical malpractice is identified as damages. In medical malpractice cases, there are numerous kinds of damages available to an injured party. California malpractice law does put restrictions on a few of these damages. Compensatory damages, which are also occasionally alluded to as actual or economic damages, recompense the victim for costs like medical bills and lost earnings because of missed workdays. California puts no cap on this kind of damages. Non-economic damages recompense the victim for things such as pain, suffering, difficulty, deformity, and bodily injury. Such damages in California are restricted to $250,000. This indicates that the maximum a court can reward an injured patient in a medical malpractice case for pain and suffering is $250,000. Punitive damages are rewarded as a manner to chastise a medical provider for irresponsible conduct. Patient and their lawyers oftentimes must demonstrate that the healthcare professional actions concerned malice or fraud to obtain punitive damages. California does not put caps on punitive damages for many medical malpractice claims.



lorum ipsumlorum ipsum Say

In over 25 years of practice on the defense side of malpractice cases, Jeff Mitchell is the attorney I fear most. He takes very good cases. Jeff has the medicine and the applicable literature down cold. He is without a doubt the best cross-examiner I have ever seen. I have paid his clients a lot of money over the years.
- John M.

Our Locations

Google Analytics Alternative